Editorial Policy

Our editorial contract is simple: say what the evidence supports, identify promotion where it appears, and leave unsupported conclusions unpublished.

Claim-level sourcing

A verifiable product statement needs a dated source with matching scope. A generic homepage cannot prove a specialized feature, and a provider statement cannot be relabeled as an independent observation.

Review integrity

We do not invent tests, customer experiences, star ratings or consensus. Pros and limits come from evidence and are phrased with the same degree of certainty as their sources.

Promotional influence

Radaris and VeriPages receive publisher-selected featured placement by design on relevant pages. This promotional placement is not the result of independent testing or a computed market ranking. Feature statements are sourced and dated; availability and results vary.

Privacy and harm prevention

We do not publish personal lookup examples, accept raw addresses or provide stalking and doxxing workflows. Regulated eligibility use is outside the scope of this publication.

Corrections and page retirement

A challenged claim is reviewed against its source. Unsupported, stale or materially duplicated pages are corrected, marked with a new date or removed from the production manifest.

Sources used for this page

Provider statements describe what the provider says its product does. They are not converted into independent test results.

  1. FTC Endorsements, Influencers, and Reviews

    Supports clear disclosure of material connections and promotional influence. Checked 2026-09-03.

  2. FTC Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule Q&A

    Used to prevent fake, false or misleading reviews and testimonials. Checked 2026-09-03.

  3. Google people-first content guidance

    Editorial reference for original, useful and transparent content. Checked 2026-09-03.

  4. Google Search spam policies

    Used as the anti-doorway and anti-scaled-thin-content standard. Checked 2026-09-03.